Updates on the Twin Cities real estate market from Edina Realty REALTOR Aaron Dickinson.

Minneapolis Real Estate Blog

Aaron Dickinson
Edina Realty
800-941-0959

Licensed in MN


Edina Realty
Search Homes for Sale
Search Foreclosures for Sale
Search SOLD Homes


Subscribe to email updates
Enter your email address:



New Term: Proceedings Subsequent

I’m currently working with 4 different banks on offers for homes.  Two of the homes are owned by the bank through foreclosure and the other two are subject to a short sale.  Well, today I learned a new term: Proceedings Subsequent.  In this case, the bank acquired a property through foreclosure however the Registrar of Titles is still showing the home owner who had the bank loan as the “fee simple” owner of the property.  So in this case the bank has to file a motion with the court and have a hearing to determine the validity of the foreclosure and assign title to the bank, this is called a Proceedings Subsequent. 

Well, normally this is all done well before we get to closing however in this case the bank waited till two weeks before closing to get title work ordered, which means I got to learn a new term and my buyers and I got to worry about whether we would close on time or not.

Posted by Aaron Dickinson - Edina Realty on 03-17-2007 at 01:03 am
Posted in General

Related Posts:
Wanted: Rental Placement Agency-Should Banks Convert ARMs into Fixed Rate Loans?-Open Houses – Buyers Beware-Market shift: What is the culprit?-

6 Comments »

  1. Aaron: As you likely already know becasue the proceeding is before the Registrar of Titles, this procedure affects only Torrens registered property, not abstract property.

    Comment by Ralph Mitchell — March 29, 2007 @ 1:06 pm
  2. Good point. I actually hadn’t connected the dots on that one but now that you mention it I see why. Thanks for the clarification!

    Comment by Aaron Dickinson — March 29, 2007 @ 2:33 pm
  3. How long did it take to get clear title? I’m in the midst of one that’s taken seven months with no end in sight. Thanks.

    Comment by Thos. — October 28, 2008 @ 8:53 am
  4. 6-9 months is not unusual.

    Comment by Aaron Dickinson - Edina Realty — October 28, 2008 @ 9:48 am
  5. Hello,

    We signed a purchase agreement for a property in St Paul. Before closing, we found out that they haven’t completed the
    Proceedings Subsequent. It’s been 2 months since we signed the purchase agreement. The attorney that’s handing the Proceeding Subsequent told us it’s very normal and there is no risk. They wanted us to close the deal now rather than wait until the Proceeding to complete. We would have to sign an acknowlegment that we’re aware of the situation.
    What would be your advise? We don’t mind to wait but the bank has been pressuring us to close.

    Are there any risk if we close before they’re done with the Proceeding Subsequent?

    Thanks,
    - Hang

    Comment by Hang — May 21, 2009 @ 10:03 am
  6. Unfortunately I cannot comment on the legal risks as I am not an attorney and that would be legal advise. I can tell you that you would want to confirm that your Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance covers these issues and that the proper paperwork has been filed. I have had clients close before a Proceedings Subsequent has been completed.

    It’s best to speak with an attorney, your agent and your title closer.

    Comment by Aaron Dickinson - Edina Realty — May 21, 2009 @ 10:18 am

Comments RSS TrackBack URI

 

Leave a comment